Most AI projects stall between the demo and the daily workflow.
We build web apps where an agent does the first pass and a person signs off. Designed and built in Las Vegas.
An agent in the workflow
This is what we mean.
The agent has a narrow job. Every step it takes is logged with the source attached. And it stops at a person: nothing goes out until someone approves it.
- intake-agent · read · email#4412 + 3 files · 09:14:03
- intake-agent · match · PO-1187 · 12 lines · 09:14:09
- intake-agent · flag · line 7 · 4.10 → 4.35 · src: invoice p.2 · 09:14:11
- intake-agent · draft · reply to supplier · 09:14:20
- intake-agent · handoff · waiting · Dana R. (purchasing) · 09:14:21
Example run, built from a real intake workflow.Every step is logged. Nothing goes out without a person.
Services
The right layer for where you are
Start with advice, start with a build, or bring us in after launch.
Start hereNot sure where an agent would actually save time?Software consultingFixed price, quoted in writing before we startA written plan: which workflow first, what the agent touches, what stays with a person, and a fixed price for the build. If an agent isn't the right tool, the plan says so.Running the operation out of an inbox and a spreadsheet?Custom web applicationsFixed price, quoted in writing before we startSite no longer matches the business?Website design and buildFixed price, quoted in writing before we startLaunched, and want someone to keep it running?Support and iterationFixed price, quoted in writing before we start
Every project
What's in the box
A measured baseline: we time the process as it runs today before we quote savings.
A written scope and a fixed price, before any build starts.
Production code you own: your repo, your accounts, tests, logging, alerts, and a runbook.
A person in the loop: the agent drafts, matches and flags; a named person approves. Every step is logged.
What clients say
In their words
“I wanted a site that sounded like me and not like every other injury firm in Vegas. Derrikk asked the right questions, wrote copy I didn't have to rewrite, and had it live fast. It loads quickly, it reads clearly on a phone, and I can update it myself without calling anyone.”
Built layer by layer.
Each layer rests on the one below it. Scroll and the project goes up one layer at a time.
layer 04 / 04Run
- 01
Foundation
Two weeks mapping your workflow, your data, and what the agent should and shouldn't touch. We time the process as it runs today before we quote.
- 02
Structure
Screens, data model, and agent roles written down. You approve a fixed scope and a fixed price.
- 03
Build
Working software every week, on a staging link you can click through.
- 04
Run
Launch, monitoring, and a monthly review of every agent action.
Questions buyers ask
Before you ask
What does the agent actually touch?
Only what the written scope says. Typically it reads incoming documents, matches them to your records, and drafts the next step. It doesn't send, pay, or change a record of yours without a person approving.
What happens when it gets one wrong?
It's flagged, not hidden. Every step is logged with the source attached, so the person reviewing sees what the agent read and why it decided what it did. The monthly review looks at every exception.
Who owns the code?
You do. The repo, the accounts, and the data are yours from day one. There's no platform licence and nothing we can switch off.
What does support cost month to month?
A flat monthly retainer with a set number of hours, quoted in writing with the build. It covers hosting, monitoring, alerts, and changes after launch.
How is this different from buying a SaaS tool?
A tool gives you its workflow. This is built around yours: your systems, your records, your rules for what a person has to approve. If a tool would do the job, the consulting plan says so.
Tell us the workflow.
Within two business days you get a written note: whether an agent fits, what it would touch, and a rough range.